Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,00, and Defendant B by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Any person who intends to operate slaughter business shall obtain a license, and slaughter and treatment of livestock shall be conducted at the permitted place of work.

From January 7, 2008, the Defendants conspireded to slaughter and sold KRW 210,00 in total to 179,000, a restaurant and health source by slaughtering one 1 male, livestock, using electric shock machines, work sites, scoos, washing machines, knifs, etc., which are kept in order to slaughter and slaughter at the “E” business establishment operated by Defendant A in Chuncheon-si without obtaining slaughter permission, and selling KRW 21 male to the “F restaurant”, which is a customer, after being treated as food refined, etc., as indicated in the list of crimes, by March 18, 2013.

As a result, Defendants were treated and treated livestock without obtaining permission from the competent authorities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A report on internal investigation (attached to E-site photographs);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the analysis of computerized books voluntarily submitted in E and the attachment of sight plates);

1. Relevant Article of the relevant Act and Articles 45 (1) 6 and 22 (1) of the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act and selection of fines for the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. The punishment shall be determined in light of the various circumstances, including the following: (a) the period of unauthorized slaughter without any reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the number of unauthorized slaughters is not significant; (c) the criminal records of the same kind and the criminal punishment exceeding the fine; and (d) the Defendants’ slaughterhouses are the place where slaughter permission is granted for the dog meat; and (e) the Defendants expressed the intent of reflect while signing the instant crime. It is so decided as per Disposition