beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for 10 months, for Defendant B, for the crimes of Article 2 of the Decision of Defendant C.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
C On November 17, 2010, after being sentenced to eight months for habitual gambling at the Cheongju District Court, the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Cheongju Prison on November 29, 201. On April 19, 2013, the same court was sentenced to eight months for a violation of the Korean Racing Association Act, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 19, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Cheongju Prison Prison.
[2014 Highest 500]
1. Defendant A’s attempted fraud is the actual owner and operator of a passenger car registered in the name of L, Mbenz CL500.
On February 26, 2013, around 17:38, a traffic accident (hereinafter "the accident of this case") occurred on the Maambi-dong's Mazz Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. located in the Maambi-dong located in the Maambi-dong, and around 17:44 on the same day after the occurrence of the accident of this case, the defendant sent a telephone to the victim Mazzz Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. with which the above car of the defendant's driving was covered by a comprehensive insurance. The main purpose of the accident reported by the defendant is to "the part concerning the part concerning the part concerning the part concerning the part concerning the part concerning the part concerning the NN driving's back of the driver's driving which the defendant left to the port at the point of the accident, and the defendant runs away from the way to opposite the above vehicle of the defendant's driving to the port."
On March 10, 2013, the Defendant visited the victim Mez Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., Cheongju-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong 846, and claimed payment of KRW 40,50,000 of the vehicle compensation according to the insurance agreement, stating that “the instant accident occurred and the vehicle was damaged to the extent that the automobile was scrapped.”
However, the facts are as follows: ① at the time when the above car of the defendant was concealed, the above car of the defendant was in progress at a speed of about 10 km per hour, and it is sufficient to keep it right.