(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.04 2015고정1849

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.04 2015고정1849

위증

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 4, 2013, the Defendant appeared to take an oath in the court of Seoul Eastern District Court No. 2 located in 404, Asansan-ro, Seoul, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, as a witness of the case of occupational embezzlement against E of the above court No. 2013Kadan2000.

The defendant testified that the defense counsel of the above case, "the defendant (E) took money in any hand between the net debts in which he takes money," and "I have taken money in good faith."

However, in fact, the defendant did not have witnessed the face of E in return for money.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. The statement to the effect that it was proper to judge whether the defendant did not take money in his/her hands among the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant against the defendant (second time)

1. Statement E in the police interrogation protocol (second, second, and replacement) of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Complaints of E preparation;

1. A copy, etc. of the judgment;

1. Written judgments of 2013 Height2000;

1. Recording records;

1. Protocol (Duplicates, A) of examination of each witness (Evidence Nos. 18,19);

1. Comprehensively taking account of the above evidence, the defendant testified to the effect that he directly observed the 50,00 won 50,000 won 10,000 won 10,000 won 10,000 won at one time and he testified to the effect that E was a loss of the above money. Thus, if he was present to the extent that he could have known the kind and number of the money in the case of E at the time, it is consistent with the common sense to witness the above money to the extent that he was able to know the kind and number of the money in the case of E, and that the defendant testified to the effect that he had previously testified with the same content in the civil case of the previous time and that at the time he was not memoryed with what kind of money in the case of E.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2015.04.03 2014노3934

-인천지방법원 2015.12.17 2014고단5032

-서울남부지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고단5192

-인천지방법원 2015.01.19 2014고단5594

-부산지방법원 2016.11.16 2016고단2736