The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the process of disputing D with D, the Defendant did not report false facts to the police station because he was injured by the baton, bones salt, tension, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment by fating fat from fats. Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the charge of the accusation of this case was erroneous and adversely affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. Not on the basis of unreasonable sentencing

Even if the judgment of the court below is unfair, the punishment of imprisonment (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 120 hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below: (i) the witness of the defendant and D had observed the dispute from the investigation stage to the trial of the court; (ii) the witness of the defendant and D went into the laundry site; (iii) the witness was consistently made a statement and testimony that D did not look into the defendant's lab; and (iv) G, which appears to have been witnessing the dispute over the defendant and D at a relatively close distance than the above F, testified that the defendant and D were flated and pushed down and pushed down with one another; however, in light of the circumstances where G appeared to be well aware that it was difficult for the defendant to capture the above G's physical part at a relatively close distance of not more than 10 meters, and there was no consistency in the defendant's testimony, such as the defendant's lab’s lab and lab’s first testimony, and the defendant's lab’s lab’s lab’s lab and lab’s lab.