A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 1, 2015, at around 04:10, the Defendant: (a) tried to leave the workplace without the name, etc. of the police officer, a police officer, who was in the patrol, who was a police officer of Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station C police station, who was in the patrol, to speak his personal information from E while on the road located in Pyeongtaek-si (hereinafter referred to as Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station C police station, which was in the patrol; (b) the police officer, who was in the patrol, attempted to leave the workplace; and (c) the police officer, upon the Defendant’s request, assaulted the police officer D of the above police officer D at one-2 times on the right drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on crime control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each written statement (D, F) statute;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order and the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of the first category (in the case of obstruction of performance of official duties/performance of official duties) (6-1 year and four months) of the Criminal Act / [decision of sentence] the defendant has no criminal record exceeding the fine, and other various circumstances shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment