logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고단2902
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On May 26, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on June 3, 2016 to the attempted robbery at the Seoul Central District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 3, 2016.

[2] The Defendant committed a crime with poor money and committed a traffic accident with intent to lend money to a person who is not living expenses and who is urged to repay his/her debts in many places, but did not cause a traffic accident, and thus, he/she borrowed money and received a reminder to repay his/her debts.

1. On January 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) called the victim, who scambling a military motive at an influent place; (b) called “a traffic accident, which leads to a sudden demand for a reimbursement of KRW 2.9 million; and (c) called “a refund of KRW 2.9 million, since scambling a telephone again from the victim; and (d) borrowed money more than 1.5 million; and (c) the victim additionally remitted money to KRW 1.5 million.

However, there is no traffic accident, and even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the money.

As above, Defendant 1 made a false statement to the victim and acquired a total of 4.4 million won through the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Serial number: D) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim.

2. On March 6, 2016, the Defendant committed fraud against the victim E by phone calls to the victim who became aware of at the construction site, and “If the victim fails to reach an agreement on the occurrence of drinking accidents at home, it was punished, and only 1.9 million won is lent.

“The Court made an order.”

However, the defendant did not have any traffic accident, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to pay the money.

Defendant 1 received 1,90,000 won from the victim’s false statement and received 1,90,000 won from the victim’s account under the same day.

arrow