logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.13 2017고단2356
사기
Text

Defendant is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes of the 2017 Highest 2356 Highest 2017 Highest 2516 Highest 2016 Highest 2516.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On November 8, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months for a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) in the Support of the Sugwon of Sugwon, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 16, 2016.

[2] Around May 2013, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 2356,” in comparison with the victim D, who had been contacted through the instant instant app “Sail” installed in a smartphone, used maliciously that the said victim had a sense and trust against the Defendant, and received money by exaggeration or making a false statement as if the victim had difficulty in returning her mother’s disease, economic difficulties, possibility of criminal punishment, etc., and received money for gambling, such as stock investment or private sports discussions.

On July 24, 2013, the Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant would receive monthly payments from the mother’s hospital expenses,” and that “the Defendant would pay the victim with the monthly payments from the mother’s hospital expenses.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he was thought to use it for stock investment or private sports discussions, and there was no other intent or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant appears to be a clerical error in the “2014-04-21” as indicated in the “2014-04-21” column of the attached Table No. 19 between around the same day and June 22, 2016, including by receiving KRW 1.5 million from the injured party on the same day on the same day.

In 99 times in total, money 227,906,380 won was remitted as the borrowed money.

In March 2016, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 2516,” was in communication with the victim E, which had been contacted through smartphones installed in smartphones. However, it seems that the said victim had a sense and trust against the Defendant, and is difficult for the victim to have a her mother to return her disease or economic difficulties.

arrow