The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court against the accused (five years of imprisonment for a term of three years, three years of probation, three years of community service, 300 hours of confiscation) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Each of the crimes of this case is deemed to require a strict punishment against the defendant in light of the fact that each of the crimes of this case committed each of the crimes of this case with contents different from the classified contents provide customers with a game machine for use, exchange the result of the game with a view to making it a speculative act by using a speculative recreation device, and that the crime of the illegal game room is a crime that damages a sound moral sense about the economy and promotes speculation in society, and thus, there is a need to punish it strictly. The size of each of the game places of this case is not small, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case even though he had the record of punishment for the same crime, even though he had been punished for the same crime, it is necessary to punish the defendant. However, the defendant's confession of each of the crimes of this case is against each of the crimes of this case, and since the period of each of the crimes of this case does not reach a relatively long period, it does not seem that the defendant would not stop such crimes, and there is no reason for the court below's assertion that the above punishment is unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.