logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.08.13 2014노135
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment, 10 months in prison, 2 years in suspended sentence, 3 years in probation, and forfeiture) of the lower court’s sentence against the Defendants is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. The crime of this case was committed by the Defendants for the use of a game machine with contents different from the classified contents and for the repurchase of books provided as free gifts. Since the crime of the illegal game room is a crime that breaks the sound moral sense about the economy and promotes speculation in society, there is a need to strictly punish the crime. The period of the business of the game room of this case is less than two months, the game machine installed is less than 45 months, and the Defendants committed the crime of this case again despite the fact that the Defendants committed the crime of this case.

On the other hand, there are two criminal records of suspended execution due to the following facts: (a) the Defendants divided their mistakes and seriously against themselves; (b) Defendant A discontinued the business of the party room because the business of the party room operated was difficult; (c) Defendant B discontinued the business of the party room; (d) Defendant B appears to have been engaged in the game room business in the process of seeking a new occupation thereafter; and (e) Defendant B seems to have no criminal records other than the same criminal records of fines; (c) Defendant B had no criminal records other than the same criminal records of the fine; (d) Defendant A had three minor criminal records of fines; (e) Defendant A had three times minor criminal records of fines; (e) the detention of the Defendants would cause excessive difficulty to his family members; (e) Defendant’s family members, fellows, and those of the parties are working in another workplace; and (e) the Defendants are currently working in another workplace; and (e) the Defendants are more favorable to the game room-related business type.

. The above.

arrow