logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2010.09.03 2010노376
상해
Text

The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

The defendant above.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the Defendant did not inflict a bodily injury on the victims by putting the victim A’s breath in a breath, drawing his bat with his left hand, or bating the victim C’s bat and sating with satch.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found all of the facts charged of this case guilty is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. Determination

A. According to the court below's decision and evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below and the court below's decision, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant suffered bodily injury on the right side of the victim, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the left hand of the victim as stated in the court below's holding.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

B. (1) The summary of this part of the facts charged and the summary of this part of the facts charged by the judgment of the court below are as follows: "In the national collection of the victim C's country located in the Kimpo-si Fow on November 7, 2008, the defendant resisted the facts that he had inflicted an injury on the victim C, such as dump satry, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the court below convicted him of this part of the facts charged.

(2) The direct evidence that conforms to the facts charged in this part of the judgment of the court below is the victim C and his husband A's investigation agency and the court below's each statement and investigation report (Evidence No. 45 pages).

First of all, I examine the statements of A and C investigative agencies and the original judgment.

① At the time when first investigation was conducted by the police, A was carried out by the wife and the Defendant, pushing with one another, pushing with, and vagabonds, and under such circumstances, the Defendant was doing so.

arrow