1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and the name of the public announcement project: B (j) project implementer for a local river maintenance project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): The public announcement of the Defendant: C on March 15, 2016;

B. 1) The current status, etc. of the instant land is 2,255 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land before the instant partition”) in Yansan-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si, the Plaintiff-owned.

(D) On July 7, 2016, the land is 1,271 square meters and E 984 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

(2) After the instant land was divided into the instant project, only the instant land was incorporated into the instant project. (2) The Defendant surveyed the instant land to purchase the instant land owned by the Plaintiff in accordance with the instant project, and the actual use of the land is a paddy field with a size of 292 square meters among the instant land, a bank with a size of 415 square meters, and a river with a size of 277 square meters.

C. On August 31, 2017, the expropriation date of the instant land owned by the Plaintiff: As a result of appraisal on October 24, 2017: Pursuant to the actual situation of use, the land of this case shall be assessed as a paddy field with a 292 square meter in the instant land, a 415 square meter in the bank, a 277 square meter in the river, and a 186,209,650 won in the aggregate of compensation for the instant land as indicated in the following table: The fact that the unit price of compensation for the area of the instant land calculated as a sum of 186,209,650 square meters in the land of this case shall be 439,700 square meters in the land of this case, 128,392,400 square meters in the land of this case, 415 square meters in the land of this case, 415 square meters in the size of 450,629,250 won in the entire evidence No.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the land category of the instant land is “the answer” and used as the answer. In 207 or 2012, flood damage occurred in the neighboring B of the instant land, and thus, 620 square meters of the land before the instant partition was damaged. While relevant agencies, including Jeonju City, including Jeonju City, are performing flood restoration work, the Defendant consented to the Plaintiff without the Plaintiff’s consent, even though F, the spouse of the Plaintiff’s land, was against the Defendant.