beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Reasons
1. The reasons for the court’s explanation of this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court of first instance misleads the judgment as follows. Thus, it shall accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[Supplementary Use] The "Defendant F" of the first instance judgment shall be deemed to be "Defendant", and the "Defendant G" shall be deemed to be "G".
The Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “F”) in Part 3 is different from the “Defendant F”) in Part 3,” and the “Defendant G” in Part 7 and 8 is different from the “Defendant G Co-Defendant G in the first instance trial” (hereinafter referred to as the “G”).
In Part 5, "The continued appeal is currently pending in the court of final appeal" in Part 4, the dismissal of appeal was made on October 15, 2015 and it became final and conclusive as it is."
The defendants in the 5th page 8 are referred to as "the defendant".
Part 5, Chapters 18 through 6 shall be deleted.
The defendants in Part 6 in Part 5 are jointly and severally "the defendant", "A" in Part 9 and "A" in Part 11 shall be "C" and "D", respectively.
Part 6, "judgments" in Part 17 shall be dismissed as "judgments on the plaintiff's cause of action" and shall be deleted from Part 18.
The 8th page 19 " was offered," following the end of the 8th page 19, "this outlines the accumulated number of member stores which have entered into a contract with the defendant from October 2003 to June 2010, and among which the fact that the member stores whose contract has already been terminated are included, are only 40 member stores operating around 2010."
In the front of the 9th 21st 21st 21st , the fact that Plaintiff A paid KRW 12,285,000 to Plaintiff B, KRW 11,60,000 to Plaintiff C, KRW 16,780,00 to Plaintiff C, KRW 11,785,00 to Plaintiff D, and KRW 7,685,00 to Plaintiff E, respectively, was as seen earlier, but the Plaintiffs paid KRW 10,00,000 to the Defendant, such as interior expenses, housework, office bond, etc.