1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. According to the facts below's determination as to the cause of the claim, or according to the overall purport of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the purport of the whole arguments and arguments, the plaintiff and the selected person C were employed by the defendant who conducts an electricity conversion equipment manufacturing business from July 1, 2015 to May 30, 2017 and worked at the defendant's workplace. The defendant is entitled to receive a summary order of KRW 12,037,340 for wages and retirement pay to the plaintiff (i.e., wages of KRW 3,90,000 for May 1, 2017) (i.e., KRW 563,040 for retirement pay 7,574,30 for retirement pay 563,04,00 for year-end retirement pay 20,225,210 for 10 (=3,370,000 for May 370, 2017, 2014).

(Defendant’s argument regarding the scope of unpaid wages, etc. against Appointed is rejected). Accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff 12,037,340 won for unpaid wages and retirement allowances, 10,225,210 won for unpaid wages and retirement allowances, and for each of them, 14 days following the retirement date of the Plaintiff and the Appointed C, to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum as stipulated in the Labor Standards Act from June 14, 2017 to the date of full payment.

2. The defendant's argument regarding the plaintiff's assertion is that since the plaintiff and the company's management deterioration agreed to pay the retirement allowance only except the amount of one-month payment and the amount of one-month payment at the time of his/her employment, the defendant's claim is KRW 7,574,300. However, since there is no evidence to acknowledge

3. In conclusion, each of the claims in this case by the plaintiff and the selector C should be accepted for reasons.

The judgment of the first instance is consistent with this conclusion.