The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (in fact-finding, misunderstanding of legal principles, and unreasonable sentencing) (the court below), although the CD-dong image taken by Defendant I in the situation at the time of the instant case did not contain all the circumstances arising between the Defendant, Victim F and G, the court below rejected the Defendant’s consistent statement of the victims who correspond to the facts charged on the ground that the Defendant’s assault face and the Victim G were not committed, and that the victim’s sound was not committed, thereby violating the rules of evidence and misunderstanding of legal principles, and sought a judgment corresponding to the original sentence (1.5 million won of a fine).

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below revealed that ① there was an important evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this case in F, G’s investigation agency, and this court’s statement, but according to the voice and image of the video CD reproduced by the court of the court below, there was only a face where the defendant obstructed the defendant from entering F, G, and preventing him from entering the Republic of Korea with his hands, and there is no evidence to support the facts charged in this case in light of the following: (i) the defendant did not use F, G, or g in assault and sound; (ii) at the time of this case, H, who used F, along with the defendant’s side and the actual ditch, used the defendant’s appearance in G at the investigative agency; (iii) although the court of the court of the court of the court below reversed the statement that the defendant did not see the defendant’s violence face at the time of this case; and (iv) the diagnosis report about F, F, and G was conducted after about one week after this case’s second time, and thus there is insufficient evidence to support the defendant’s statement in this case.

B. The following circumstances cited by the court below, which are acknowledged by the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court below and the court below, i.e., the case was punished in the process of comparison with the defendant, I, etc. of the commercial management body where DNA brought in a house at the first floor of underground in order to operate the safe point of view, and E.