logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.09.26 2014나3628
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's preliminary claim added at the first instance prior to the remand is dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiff filed a claim for registration of transfer of ownership against the Defendant and was sentenced to a judgment against the lower court. Accordingly, the Plaintiff added the claim for confirmation of ownership to the conjunctive claim and was sentenced to a dismissal judgment prior to the first remand. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a final appeal in accordance with Supreme Court Decision 2012Da5659 and filed a final appeal in accordance with Supreme Court Decision 2012Da5659, thereby reversed and remanded the part concerning the claim for confirmation of ownership and dismissed the remainder of the final appeal.

Accordingly, the first instance court rendered a judgment prior to the second instance citing the plaintiff's conjunctive claim, and the defendant appealed against the above judgment prior to the remand, and the Supreme Court reversed it and remanded to the second instance judgment.

Therefore, the scope of this court's trial is limited to the plaintiff's claim for confirmation of ownership that was reversed and remanded by the second judgment of remand.

2. Basic facts

A. According to the Forest Survey Division prepared in the Japanese colonial era, the Gyeonggi-do Forest Land Survey Division: (a) the 3rd 6th 6th fluoral 8th fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor flu

B. C completed registration of preservation of ownership under the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Restoration, Preservation, etc. of Unclaimed Land in a D Forest before subdivision on December 8, 1992.

C. On October 28, 1993, D forest was divided into 28,876 square meters of D forest and 28,876 square meters of land and 2,172 square meters of N forest and 2,172 square meters of land and d forest and d forest in the annexed sheet (hereinafter “instant forest”).

The plaintiff.

arrow