1. The Defendant: KRW 1,00,000 for Plaintiff A, KRW 500,00 for Plaintiff B, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff E, respectively, and KRW 12,100,00 for Plaintiff D.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A is the spouse of the network G, and Plaintiff B, C, Plaintiff D, and Plaintiff E are children of the network G.

The defendant is a corporation specializing in the creation and maintenance of a park cemetery as a mark "H".

B. On November 15, 1980, the net G’s mother, was sold in lots by the Defendant 60 square meters from the Jin-si Jin-si, Gwangju (hereinafter “instant park cemetery”).

The membership certificate (Evidence A No. 4) issued by the Defendant under the name of the deceased I is written as follows: “Post G and A weather shall be the time when they are born later (hereinafter “instant text”).

C. I died in 1989 and was buried in the instant park cemetery.

G died on December 12, 2015. While the Plaintiffs intended to store a net G in the instant park cemetery, the Defendant refused or refused to install a string for other family members than the deceased I. As such, the Plaintiffs laid the dead G’s remains in a charnel house with an extended period in which the wall system is located in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] A without any dispute, Gap evidence 1 through Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 7, purport of whole pleading, and purport of whole pleading

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiffs asserted that the instant park cemetery was sold to a family cemetery, and the Defendant refused to burial of the deceased G without any justifiable reason, and the Plaintiffs were placed in a charnel separate without gathering the deceased G from her mother I.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for economic and mental damages caused by breach of contract.

B. The defendant's assertion that the park cemetery of this case was sold to the family cemetery.

The defendant did not state the phrase of this case in the evidence No. 4, which was altered by any arbitra.

In general, the defendant does not specify whether it is a private cemetery or a family cemetery when concluding a contract for sale in lots with members, and it is time to store a deceased person to determine whether it is a family cemetery.

However, this case.