logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2015.05.29 2014가단52416
소유권이전등기
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The deceased on January 1, 1989, 198 the deceased’s death and inheritance relationship ① The deceased on January 1, 1989, as wife A, Women B, C, C, C, and Women’s Death, Plaintiff E (the name before the name of the name of the deceased), and Plaintiff F became co-inheritors.

② On April 25, 1996, Overnam I completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of each land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “each land of this case”) which was owned by the network H on April 25, 1996, on the ground of an inheritance by consultation or division. The remaining Plaintiff F, on the same day, completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of each land listed in the separate sheet No. 2, which was owned by the network H on the same day, due to an inheritance by consultation or division.

B. On March 4, 2005, the deceased I’s death and inheritance relationship (I) completed the marriage report with the Defendant who was the People’s Republic of China, and adopted K on November 21, 2007, who was the Defendant.

② On January 27, 2014, I died on January 27, 2014, K, the wife of the Defendant and his/her children, became co-inheritors.

(3) On April 1, 2014, the defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer in his/her name on the grounds of inheritance by consultation or division with respect to each of the instant land.

C. The deceased A’s death and inheritance relationship on October 4, 2014 during the instant lawsuit, and A died on October 4, 2014, and as the Plaintiffs and the deceased I’s heir, and K were co-inheritors.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 21, 28, 29, 39, Eul evidence Nos. 16 and 20, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Each of the instant lands asserted by the Plaintiffs is the land for which the deceased H’s inheritors agreed to distribute according to the inheritance shares, and only the registration of ownership transfer was completed in their sole name for the convenience of reducing inheritance taxes.

After that, on January 23, 2012, the deceased I promised to divide the land of this case into the successors in the place where the deceased A, the plaintiff F, the non-party L couple, the defendant was present in the Gu administration.

In addition, the network I collected siblings on November 24, 2013, and 'the defendant'.

arrow