Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Criminal facts

1. On April 13, 2016, Defendant A was a person who released from the 20th election for the National Assembly member in the 20th election for the 20th National Assembly member, and Defendant B was an election campaign worker of the said A.

A candidate who intends to register as a member of the National Assembly with no affiliation shall obtain a recommendation from the election commission from 30 to 500 electors on the "candidate recommendation letter" received from the election commission, but may make a registration of a candidate.

Defendant

A registered as an I Party preliminary candidate at the H Election Commission on March 3, 2016, but failed to receive official nomination. On March 14, 2016, A resigned from the I Party, and on March 15, 2016, filed an application for change to a non-affiliated position with the H Election Commission on March 15, 2016.

Defendant

A received 50 copies of a candidate recommendation from the H Election Commission on March 19, 2016. On March 23, 2016, A applied for re-issuance on the loss of 29 copies among them. On March 24, 2016, A applied for candidate registration on March 24, 2016.

2. Criminal facts;

A. On March 19, 2016, Defendant A instructed Defendant B to obtain a candidate’s recommendation from the electorates on the “A Election Affairs Office” as of March 19, 2016, but Defendant B received a recommendation from Defendant B until March 22, 2016, and discussed the measures with Defendant B.

At that time, Defendant B said, “I have the name of the Do Council member and the election of the National Assembly member. There is a list stating the name and address of the electorate which has been prepared at that time.”

Defendant

In order to bring about a list of approximately 500 electors, Defendant A: “I prepared a candidate recommendation letter by using the list, and examined the election before ...., the candidate recommendation letter was prepared and sealed, and ordered to forge the candidate recommendation letter.” The Defendant B had expressed his mind to implement it as ordered.

As such, the Defendants are K. K.