logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.01.09 2013고단1118
사기
Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged reveals that the Defendant: (a) was placed in the business of selling the CFF car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”); (b) on July 9, 2012, the Defendant was asked to ask the victim E about the instant vehicle’s price and condition of the instant vehicle, etc. from the F that colored the CFF car to sell the CF car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”); and (c) issued the vehicle performance and condition inspection register stating “the instant vehicle was replaced before the driver’s seat, and the front door repair.” (d) issued the vehicle performance and condition inspection register stating “the instant vehicle was replaced with the front door,” and the front door was closed. The other part is a non-accident and the vehicle price of the instant vehicle is KRW 45 million.”

However, in fact, the instant vehicle was destroyed by a traffic accident and the owner of the insurance company takes over the vehicle from the owner, and the vehicle purchased from the insurance company through the auction by G was damaged to the extent that the repair cost is equal to or greater than 60% of the value of the vehicle, such as the driver in front, front and rear fences, front and rear fences, and front and rear doors.

Around July 10, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving F, had F F, know of the fact, obtain from F the said fact that “The instant vehicle is replaced with the fences front of the driver’s seat, and the front door is an accident without any change, so purchase shall be made at KRW 46 million because the vehicle was repaired,” and obtained from F to F as the price for the vehicle from F on July 10, 2012, and obtained from F as the price for the vehicle from F as the price for the vehicle.

2. The defendant's assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the assertion is that the Defendant denies the facts charged by asserting that he/she did not deception the F.

(b) judgment 1 diversity, and witness E’s legal and investigative agencies, respectively;

arrow