logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2012.11.08 2012고단1202
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[202] At around 23:40 on April 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) had the same attitude of paying the price to the victim even though he did not have any money during drinking and having no intent or ability to pay it to the victim even though he did not order the drinking and drinking, the Defendant acquired a pecuniary benefit equivalent to the amount of the said amount by failing to pay the price to the victim, even though he was provided by the victim with alcohol and alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 410,00,000 in total, such as two liquors, one week, one week, and one week Dins, etc. in the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

[2012 Highest 1402] Around 23:30 on May 29, 2012, the Defendant had the same attitude of paying the price to the victim even though he did not have any money, even if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he did not pay the price, at the time of drinking and drinking, the Defendant obtained a pecuniary benefit equivalent to the same amount by failing to pay the price, even though he was provided by the victim with alcoholic beverages and alcoholic beverages equivalent to the sum of KRW 450,00,000, such as two disease and alcoholic beverages, etc. from the victim, in other words, even though he was provided by the victim, who did not pay the price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and G;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. From among concurrent offenders, it is inevitable to punish the instant crime in light of the fact that the instant crime was committed again, despite the repeated sentencing grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.

However, in consideration of the frequency, amount, etc. of crime, punishment was determined as ordered.

arrow