Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 14, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for occupational embezzlement at the Cheongju District Court on August 14, 202, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 22, 2020.

No one shall transfer or acquire any means of access, unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act, in using and managing the means of access.

On September 1, 2019 to October 2010, the Defendant heard the horses that “the head of a Tong would be changed due to high-profit know-how,” through a telegram from his name-dissurg, and around that time, sent one physical card connected to the account of community credit cooperatives (B) in the name of the Defendant by using the 6 Cheongju-ro bus terminal via the Cheongju-ro, So-ro, Cheongju-ro, Cheongju-ro, Cheongdong-ro, Cheongju-ro, Cheongdong-ro, one copy of the physical card connected to the account of community credit cooperatives (B) in the name of the Defendant, and continuously transferred the physical card password number, Defendant’s identification card number, and photograph of the head of a passbook with the telegram, and then transferred the means of access by receiving KRW 300,000 from

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each petition, written statement, report on internal investigation of the victims, and previous records shown in a report on internal investigation (A community credit cooperatives under the name of the victims): Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the defendant's statutory statement, including criminal records;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 49(4)1 and 6(3)1 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (in a case where the suspension of execution of sentence is invalidated or revoked) include: (a) the defendant, on a separate occasion, has been sentenced to imprisonment for eight months; (b) depth and reflects the previous crimes; (c) the equity in the case of judgment concurrently with the crime of the previous crime; and (d) other all the circumstances which form the conditions for sentencing.