logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2019.01.09 2018고단573
산업안전보건법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months, Defendant B for 4 months, and Defendant C for a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

Co., Ltd. is a corporation whose main business is the manufacture of lectures in Chungcheong-gun D, and Defendant A is the person in charge of safety management of Cudio factory as the former business of Defendant C Co., Ltd., and Defendant B is the director of Defendant C Co., Ltd. who is an employee in charge of safety in the work site.

1. On April 11, 2018, at around 15:17, the victim E (the age 52), a worker at the joint criminal conduct scene in Defendant A and Defendant B, the victim E (the age 52) was engaged in the work of transporting garads by using garacs ( approximately 500 kg per 1 multiples) in order to put the GI lectures (the annual lads) set up in the above voice factory Adong at the contact equipment.

Since the steel board is a heavy weight and is transported by wire ropes, and thus, there is a risk of degradation of the steel board during the work. In such a case, the Defendants shall conduct a prior investigation into the relevant work and the geographical, geographical, and geo-story status, etc. in accordance with Article 38 of the Rules on Industrial Safety and Health, and prepare a work plan including safety measures to prevent any danger of fall, fall, and electric shock, taking into account the result thereof, and have the Defendants conduct the work in accordance with the plan.

In addition, the work commander should be designated pursuant to Article 39 of the Rules on Industrial Safety and Health Standards to direct work according to the work plan.

Nevertheless, the Defendants did not conduct a prior investigation into the working site before the victim E performs the above handling of heavy objects, and did not prepare a work plan including safety measures to prevent risks.

In addition, the employer did not place the commander at the site and neglected the victim to work by using the server alone.

Ultimately, the Defendants jointly do so by negligence in the course of performing their duties, and the stronger board during their work has lost balance, and the victims are victims.

arrow