A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and eight months.

The defendant is the applicant B for compensation, who is the 170,000 won and the compensation applicant.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On May 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) on June 12, 2019, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern Southern District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

On June 30, 2019, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government P on June 30, 2019, posted a letter to the effect that Q Q’s Internet “P admission tickets” would be purchased by the victim’s nautical miles, using mobile phones, and made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would sell the Defendant’s “T nautical nautical nautical nautical nautical nautical nautical nautical nautical nautical nautical nautical nautical nautical miles

However, the defendant did not hold the above admission ticket, and he thought that he will receive money from the victim and use it for living expenses and Internet gambling, so even if he receives the above admission ticket from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the above admission ticket.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 140,000 won from the victim to the company bank account (S) under the name of the Defendant for the same day as the price for admission tickets on the same day, and received 7,337,600 won in total over 47 times from June 30, 2019 to October 28, 2019 in such a way as described in attached Table 1.

around October 1, 2019, the Defendant confirmed that, at the Defendant’s house located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government P, posted a letter to the effect that Q Q “P purchases a right to accommodation for the use of a mobile phone,” the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “P would immediately transmit the right to accommodation at the prime time of transfer of the price to the victim as text messages.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not possess a right to accommodation for a well-being, and he thought that he would receive money from the victim to use it as living expenses.