Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and by a fine of 5,00,000 won.
However, the period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a business owner operating "D" on the 5th floor of Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C building, and E is an employee of the above business establishment.
The Defendant, in collusion with E on September 3, 2015, received a total of 2.80,000 won from two police officers who pretended to be customers at the place of the massage procedure on September 3, 2015, who provided guidance to him/her as 4.13 and 414, brought into the sexual traffic female F to 413.
From February 28, 2013 to the above time, one of the police officers and one of the sexual intercourses was arranged to arrange sexual intercourses, and the act of arranging sexual intercourse was conducted for business from around February 28, 2013.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;
1. A written statement;
1. Application of statutes, such as site photographs;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging, etc. Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. Imprisonment with labor and a fine concurrently pursuant to Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as arranging selective sexual traffic;
1. Article 62 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;
1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;
1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment [the scope of recommendations] / [the grounds for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act / [the scope of recommendations] 2 types of sexual traffic crimes subject to 19 years of age or older, such as brokerage of sexual traffic (such as brokerage of sexual traffic by business and payment of consideration, etc.) / [the person who is subject to special sentencing] / [the person who is subject to special sentencing] / [the decision of sentence] / The person who has been punished twice for the same type of crime
However, the execution of the above imprisonment shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects the crime, that the defendant is a person with a disability from the first-class perspective, that the defendant is a person with a disability at the first-class level, that there is no record of punishment except for the previous conviction and the first-time fine due to the violation of the Fire Services Act (198),