A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

On November 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim and transferred the amount of damage to a bank account under the name of another person from the account holder; and (b) transferred the amount to another person’s account designated by the account holder; and (c) received 1% of the said amount in return.

As a result, on November 12, 2018, the person under whose name was not the victim B, by misrepresenting the victim B with a telephone call and deceiving him as if he would impair low interest rate substitute loan, and then, on November 16, 2018, the victim B had the victim B transfer KRW 10 million to the E Association account in D name (Account Number:F) around October 10:27, 2018, and by deceiving the victim G by the aforementioned method, the victim transferred KRW 40 million to the above E Association account around November 12:30, 2018.

1. On November 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received and transmitted the status of KRW 10 million,00,000,000, which was remitted from the victim B to the nearest J bank account (Account Number: L) in the name of K bank account (hereinafter “Account Number”) under the direction of the victim B; and (b) transferred the amount of KRW 980,000,000 to KRW 10,000,000,000, excluding KRW 200,000,000,000,000 to KRW 8,000,000,000 to KRW 10,000,000,000.

As a result, the Defendant aided and aided the fraudulent act of the person who was unable to receive the name of the telephone financial fraud organization by receiving the money from the victim via D's account, etc.

2. On November 16, 2018, the Defendant, who attempted to commit fraud, received KRW 40 million, which D withdrawn under the direction of the person who did not receive his/her name, from the roads front of the multilateral-affiliated branch of the E Union in Sejong M, and waiting to transfer the passbook without using the said method.

However, the police officer who was temporarily arrested by the D's report suspected of the telephone financial fraud crime could not remit the above money to the person who was named in his name.

This is the defendant.