logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.03 2014고단9308
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while suffering from alcohol use dependence and shock control disorder, lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to drinking. On August 13, 2014, around July 7:15, 2014, on the ground that the Defendant was faced with the victim E (year 27 years old) and shoulder in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City’s entertainment drinking club corridor, the Defendant was at the time of drinking and launching the above victim.

이에 피해자 E이 도망을 가자 피고인은 그의 일행인 피해자 F(26세)에게 “친구 어딨냐 ”고 하면서 위험한 물건인 맥주병으로 그의 이마 부위를 1회 때렸다.

The defendant found the above victim E, and he saw him as Maerer's disease.

Accordingly, the defendant, carrying a dangerous object, and assaulted victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. A partial statement fit to the defendant (which was made on the sixth public trial date);

1. Statements made in compliance with witness E, F and G in the second protocol of the trial;

1. The statement made to the accused in the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect;

1. Statement made in compliance with each police statement (1, 2 times) with E and F,

1. Each record book of E or F;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion on voluntary report of conduct, each application for no punishment, and his defense counsel’s assertion. The Defendant and their defense counsel asserted that, as stated in the indictment, the Defendant did not have any time to the victims due to a shoulderer’s disease, and the beer’s disease was laid on the floor to put the victims into a beer’s disease, and that it did not commit an assault to “on hand” with dangerous things.

A. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, i.e., the victims, after the occurrence of the instant case, shall have reached an agreement on the investigation of witnesses and the Defendant two times at the investigative agency, following the occurrence of the instant case.

arrow