logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.11.20 2014고단878
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

878 Highest 2014

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) provides that the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a C salary solid freight truck.

On June 16, 2014, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol around 10:10, driven the above cargo while drinking, and got the driver to go behind the road of the State Office in front of the State Office in front of the State Office in front of 256, as the Gangwon-do Incheon Incheon Metropolitan Government.

Since there is a center line of yellow-ray, there was a duty of care to safely operate the vehicle to the vehicle driver.

Nevertheless, in order to make a left-hand turn from the opposite vehicle due to negligence near the median line, the defendant neglected this and received the back part of the left-hand side of the E-Wurged Vehicle owned by the victim D, which was stopped, as the back part of the cargo vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence as above, avoided the repair cost of KRW 419,186 to the extent that the repair cost, such as the exchange of back door on the left-hand side, destroyed the said car owned by the victim and escaped without taking any measure at the time of the occurrence of a traffic accident

2. Around 10:20 on June 16, 2014, the Defendant driving the said cargo without obtaining a driver’s license in the section from around about 1.7 km to the front road in front of the original teaching village in the front of the U.S. Do government office located in the Gangwon-do Incheon-do Incheon-do Incheon-gun, an Eup, via the same Eup/Myeon system from the front road to the front road in front of the U.S. Do government office located in the same Eup/Myeon.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the above cargo vehicle that was not covered by mandatory insurance as stated in Paragraph 2.

4. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) by the Defendant is driving the above cargo vehicle while drinking alcohol as described in paragraph 2.

arrow