logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2020.09.18 2020고단852
명예훼손
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant and the victim B (the age of 23) of the facts charged are between the workplace rent that the Defendant and the victim (the age of 23) together worked at C Samcheonpo Office Co., Ltd., and there was a fact that they were hedging at one week teaching system around April 2019.

D. E is between the defendant, the victim and the above company's working hours. A.

Around May 2019, the Defendant stated that, at around May 2019, the Defendant had sexual intercourses with D and D with D, who drinked with D and alcoholic beverage at a mutual influence in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-gu, Sacheon-si, and that, “I had a good opportune and good opportune. A more active time was made on the side of women, and is also good at the time of sexual intercourse.”

However, the defendant and the victim did not have sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

B. Around June 2019, the Defendant: (a) referred the victim to D around Sacheon-si (Sacheon-si) around June 2019; and (b) referred D to “B to report that he/she would board or leave the E vehicle; (c) the direction of the vehicle would leave the vehicle to the front dong; (d) whether he/she will go to the telecom, or to the telecom.”

However, in fact, the victims are small between the E and the Sacheon-Eup, but there was no fact between the practical operation and the Moel village, and there was no fact like the Moel.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim pursuant to Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.

However, since a written agreement that the victim does not want punishment against the defendant was submitted to this court on August 25, 2020, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow