logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.08.17 2017고단2417
사기
Text

Defendant

The sentence of A shall be one year, and the imprisonment of Defendant B shall be eight months.

Defendant

B This decision is rendered against B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In order to stabilize the residence of homeless workers in the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport along with F and F Brokers, the Defendants abused the use of the National Housing Fund as financial resources for the financing of the National Housing Fund to operate the employee deposit loan system at a rate lower than the market interest rate without securing the entire housing loan from one bank to obtain a fraudulent loan.

F, while managing recruitment books in relation to fraud loans, F gave a leading instruction related to loans, and as Defendant A has served in Mbrick Co., Ltd., a document forgery book, forged and provided a certificate of employment, health insurance qualification certificate, and so on.

Defendant

A plays a role as a false tenant of apartment house and Defendant B.

On May 23, 2013, the Defendants drafted a lease agreement with the lessor and the lessee, as the Defendants leased KRW 140,000,000 to Defendant A, the H office located in Yongsan-si, Osan-si, 107 Dong 1201, U.S., one of their own possession, as if they leased KRW 140,000 to Defendant A.

Defendant

A received a false move-in report on the same day and the date of confirmation, and submitted a written lease contract to the staff in charge of the entire house loan to the staff in charge of the branch office in the OB of the Han Bank, together with a false certificate of employment.

The Han Bank actually prepared the submitted documents and sent 96 million won as the loans to Defendant A on the same day with the knowledge that the loans were used as the entire housing loan for workers.

However, the lease contract, certificate of employment, etc. was made falsely as above, and there was no fact that Defendant B leased the house or served in that company by Defendant A, and there was no intention to use the loan as the deposit for the lease.

The Defendants, in collusion with F and F Brokers, acquired 96 million won by deceiving the Victim Han Bank.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow