The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to be committed under favorable circumstances, such as the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, the police officers D sought the Defendant’s wife, and there is no criminal record of the same kind. However, the crime of this case is committed under the circumstances that the Defendant was under the control of police officers D and E while waiting due to the problem of the taxi engineer and fee, and attempted to leave the taxi engineer, and the police officers were under the control of the crime of this case, and the Defendant was under the control of the police officer, who was under the control of the police officer. The Defendant was not under the control of the crime of this case. The Defendant was not under the control of the police officer’s imprisonment with prison labor for a period of 10 years before and after the enforcement of the Act on Promotion of the 20th anniversary of the punishment of this case. The Defendant’s imprisonment with prison labor for more than 10 years after the lapse of 10 years after the enforcement of the Act on Promotion of the 20th of the sentence of this case. The Defendant’s imprisonment with prison labor for more than 20 years after the sentence of this case’s imprisonment with prison labor.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.