logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.15 2018고단3720
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, as the representative director of C Co., Ltd. in the facts charged, is an employer who runs the business of manufacturing motor vehicle parts by employing 20 full-time workers.

The defendant worked in the above workplace from October 13, 199 to December 8, 2017 and served as retirement allowances of D 43,284,228 won, and from May 2, 201 to December 28, 2017, and did not pay 20,287,680 won of retirement allowances of E that retired from office within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement on the extension of the payment deadline between the parties.

2. Article 44 subparagraph 1 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits and Article 9 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits: The judgment dismissing a public prosecution that submitted a written application for non-prosecution of punishment for victims after the prosecution under the proviso to Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow