logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2017.10.18 2017고단523
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant, as the representative director of the B-B, worked in the company, and did not pay KRW 18,485,135 of the retirement allowance of C retired on January 1, 2017 to the lapse of 14 days from the retirement date.

Judgment

Applicable Act: Article 44 subparag. 1 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits for Workers and Article 9 of the Act: Dismissal of a public prosecution on July 28, 2017 after the prosecution of the instant case under the proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits for Workers is submitted as a written agreement under the name of victimized workers on July 28, 2017: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow