The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

The defendant shall pay 63,00 won to the applicant for physical damage.

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Cheongju District Court’s Chungcheong support on August 9, 2017, and on December 30, 2017, the suspension of the execution was revoked. On December 13, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a fine for fraud in the Cheongju District Court’s Chungcheong support on December 13, 2017. On January 24, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the same crime in the Cheongju District Court’s Chungcheong support, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 25, 2018.

[2] The Defendant sent a normal ticket to the injured party even if he/she did not have a factual container on November 18, 2017 and received the payment from the injured party because he/she did not have a contact ticket

Despite the absence of intent or ability to set aside, a notice was posted on the Internet’s website, stating that “D 2017 CONERTIN SEUL’s sale of the PPet,” and received KRW 113,500 from the victim E who reported the relevant writing to the Kakao Bank’s account (Account Number:F) under the name of the victim E who visited him/her.

In addition, from around that time to November 30, 2017, the Defendant enticed the victims by the same method eight times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, and acquired the remittance of KRW 630,500 from the victims.

The defendant of "2018 Highest 86" sent a normal ticket to the defendant on November 16, 2017 (" January 16, 2017 of the indictment") even if he/she does not have any substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right of defense even if he/she corrects a clerical error and without changing the indictment, he/she seems to have no substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right of defense. Therefore, even if he/she is paid the price from the injured person,

Despite the absence of intent or ability to reduce, he/she posted a letter on “Twitter” with the phrase “sale of D’s contact diskettes,” and then acquired KRW 115,00 from the victim G who reported and contacted the above writing to the Defendant’s name bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant in the name of Kakao bank account in the name of the Defendant.

b)a summary of the evidence;