A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on July 8, 2014, on the part of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Dong-gu around July 8, 2014; and (b) on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Plaintiff, on the part of the Plaintiff, on the part of the Plaintiff, did not have the intent or ability to normally pay the taxi fee; (c) on the part of the Plaintiff, the Defendant was working as if he would normally pay the taxi fee; and (d) on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Plaintiff, on the part of the Plaintiff, on the part of the Government at the end of 01:36, the Defendant used the Victim’s taxi up to the 38,0

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the above charges from the victim.

2. On July 9, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 02:15, 201, on July 9, 2014, on the Dong in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu; (b) on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, on board a taxi, did not intend or have the ability to pay the taxi fee normally; (c) on the part of the Plaintiff, the Defendant was working as if he would normally pay the taxi fee; and (d) on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Plaintiff, on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Plaintiff, on the part of the Plaintiff, on the part of the Plaintiff, while

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the above charges from the victim.

3. On July 9, 2014, the Defendant was not in charge of the following: (a) around 16:20 on July 9, 2014, at “I restaurant” operated by the Victim H H in Dongducheon-si, the Defendant was not in charge of the food value, despite having no intent or ability to pay the food value normally; (b) as if he would normally pay the food value; and (c) the Defendant was in charge of the food value by ordering one of the veget veget veget veget veget veget veget veget veget

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and received the above list from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of C, E, and H;

1. Each receipt, each summary order, i.e., the application of the law of inquiry into the written request.