A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in personal construction business, who is ordered at the water supply and sewerage business office and executes construction work by a limited liability company C (representative D). Of the “G business” that a limited liability company E (representative F) performs subcontracted construction work, the Defendant entered into a construction management agreement with a limited liability company E on November 1, 2009 with respect to the water supply work (I block) of the So-jin-gu Hwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and actually performed the construction work at the said section.

On June 13, 2010, the Defendant discontinued construction with approximately 52% of the above construction work and received approximately KRW 540 million from a limited liability company E, which is the construction cost corresponding thereto, by threatening the Defendant to know to the media, etc. of defective construction work while performing the said construction work. However, the Defendant was willing to raise money under the pretext of additional construction cost, etc. from limited liability companies C and E by threatening the Defendant to know it to the media, etc.

1. On October 8, 2010, the Defendant called the victim J, the site manager of a limited liability company C, by phoneing to the victim J, and called, “In the absence of payment of the construction cost under the pretext of the additional construction work, the Defendant did not stick to the above construction work, walked to the water pipe and replaced the existing pipe with a new pipe, and did not perform it. At the time when the water pipe is attached, the Defendant would know the fact of the defective construction work, such as the fact of burying the pipe under the water pipe, Cheongdae, and the Board of Audit and Inspection, etc., of the fact that the said victim J, the said victim J in the same manner and from January 14, 201, the victim K, the head of the E-site manager of the limited liability company, were 48 times a day to 23 times a day by the same method.”

On January 18, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around January 18, 201, between the victims and the victims frighted by the Defendant J and K, and (b) around 218,180,000,000 won under the name of additional equipment substitute for the L, etc., a limited liability company E worked under the direction