logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.10.27 2013고단226
출판물에의한명예훼손등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 1263] Defendant A is the representative and reporter of J (K up to January 2012) and Defendant C works as the issuer and reporter of the said J.

1. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A and C;

A. The Defendants, who committed the crime against the victim LM managing director, conspiredd to gather the problems at the construction site and report them to the public in a manner that seems to have seen the attitude of reporting them to the public. As such, the Defendants offered hot materials to the relevant persons at the construction site to take money and valuables under the pretext of advertising expenses.

around May 201, the Defendants visited P, a site manager, of the construction site of “the underground water pipe for agricultural use,” who was ordered by the N branch of the Agricultural and Fishing Villages Corporation, in the construction site of “M” in the construction site of “M” (hereinafter referred to as “M”), and told P, a site manager of the construction site, in a manner that seems to have been engaged in press reports, and told P, a public site manager, in a manner that seems to have taken the position of media reports. After doing so, Defendant A, as the N branch office of the said construction site of the Agricultural and Fishing Villages Corporation, the place where the said construction is ordered, found Defendant A as the N branch office of the said construction site of the said Corporation, and worked in Q, a staff member in charge of the said construction site, without installing a steel panel at the site of the construction site laid underground as an irrigation water pipe for agricultural use in the Corporation.” Accordingly, the Defendants took the same attitude to gather and report the problems of the construction site and other related materials.

On the other hand, the victim L, who was in charge of the above construction-related work, was working as the managing director of the above M, was able to hear the report from P that the Defendants did not establish the lecture board at the construction site and sent the same attitude as the press report, and Q, “K press found and reported the problems in the construction site.” The victim L, who was in charge of the above construction-related work, was fluened by Q Q.

around June 20, 2011, Defendant C was found to drinked and found Defendant C at the mutual infinite coffee shop located on the second floor near R Station on June 20, 2011.

arrow