logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.05.29 2014구합4939
징계처분취소
Text

1. On May 27, 2014, the Defendant’s disciplinary action for seven days of service against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

From June 7, 2012, the Plaintiff is a person who was in office as the head of the Army Association Division Office of B, and was in office as a rank master and a position assistant director.

On December 2013, the Plaintiff was in charge of the funeral chairperson of the deceased C Captain who committed suicide due to sexual indecent acts and cruel acts, etc., and was conducted in the military association legal branch of the army around 2013.

On February 25, 2014, the Plaintiff explained the father and the mother father of the deceased, who is a surviving family member, about the tent, and made a statement to the effect that “The private house of the deceased, who was present in the natural disaster, was presumed to be the deceased,” and that according to the private suicide, the women’s old age “I would like to be too good for the people and the birth. I want to cease the human life. I want to see that the deceased’s body with learning and interest directly leads to an undecent human organ, and that his father said that he was the father “prehing.”

After that, as to the plaintiff's statement, the article stating that "the military used the victim's improper statement to the victim's bereaved family members to reach an agreement with the perpetrator, and the speaker stated that he/she was not aware of the fact itself, and that he/she did not purport it." was reported to each press.

As to the Plaintiff’s above remarks and press reports, ① Although the deceased’s death case should be noted separately in and outside the military, the Defendant sent it to his/her bereaved family as it is, and as a result, caused the media to feel suspicion that the Gun has followed an agreement with the perpetrator and caused a violation of the military personnel’s duty to maintain dignity (Article 9 of the Military Service Rule). ② According to the National Defense Public Relations Directive, the military personnel should inform the media department in charge of publicity when he/she receives a request for an interview, despite having to inform him/her of the fact that he/she should go through the public relations department.

arrow