logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.13 2017고정1771
도박장소개설
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B, from March 25, 2015 to April 11, 2015, the Defendant prepared a gambling house by preparing cards, refixs, etc. within the residence of Suwon-si C Building D, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and prepared a gambling house. The Defendant collected 6-7 gambling actors in the name of E and used 52 cards and provided 4 copies of a card for one person, using 52 card, making up 1/2 of the first 5,000 to 1 card each time he/she receives the first 5,000 to 3 times the number of card, and the last 1/2 of the card differs in the form of non-refinite, and the number of persons with a card with a low figure is smaller than 6 to 8 hours, and opened a place of gambling for profit-making purposes (hereinafter referred to as “finite for profit-making purposes”).

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol (No. 1, No. 2) (E made a statement at the police station to the effect that the defendant operated the instant gambling, but the statement was reversed in this court to the effect that the defendant did not operate the said gambling.

E made a statement in the police as above, because police officers had no mind and there is no good space between the defendant and the defendant by questioning several police officers.

However, E’s statement at the police does not conflict with other evidence, such as F, G, H’s statement, F’s monetary record, etc., and E appeared at the police at least three times in this case and made a false statement.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

E In this court, the court stated that “Around April 5, 2015, there was a fact that he borrowed money from a person who was lower than the other party to the above gambling room.” While the defendant was seen as the defendant, the defendant was absolutely not operating the above gambling room.” However, whether the defendant lent money to anyone at the time, who was who was not the defendant, who was the game, was the person who was in contact with the game, and who was infinite and on-site expenses.”

arrow