logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.08.14 2012가단39716
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 1, 2012, the Plaintiff driving Ba B Oba on July 11, 2013, while proceeding along the way in front of the D’s station located in Seojin-gu, Seojin-gu, Jeondong-gu, Seoul with a view to a scarcity of scarcity, and the ordering place was the Defendant Korea Water Resources Corporation (hereinafter “Water Resources Corporation”) and the Si Corporation, a road temporarily constructed by the Defendant limited liability company (hereinafter “original construction”), approximately 80cm in width, about 10cm in depth, about 10cm in width, - 15cm in width, and suffered injury, such as external blood transfusion, since the center was lost and the center was lost.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The point of accident of this case is a straight line between D gas stations in Seojin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City and E located in the width of the gas station in Jeonjin-gu. The point of accident of this case is a road that recognized and publicly announced as “City/Do-7 lines” and the route name “Iri-do roads” on July 13, 2001.

C. During the construction site of this case, Defendant Hoho Construction installed a safety sign, etc. on the section of the Hoposung Tym distance from the Seocho Tym.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, 14, 15 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence 2 to 7 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment thereon

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the construction of Defendant Won-ho has a duty to take appropriate measures so that the roads temporarily packed in the instant construction may not be invaded. In addition, in the event of the invasion of a road, the Plaintiff has a duty to install warning signs or warning signs, etc. and prevent accidents in advance. Defendant Water Resources Corporation also has the duty to manage and supervise the roads as a contractor of Defendant Won-ho Construction, and Defendant Jeonju City/Do has the duty to manage the roads in a safe way as the subject of the management of the roads in this case. However, the accident in this case occurred due to negligence, and the Defendants are liable to pay damages to each Plaintiff as a joint tortfeasor.

B. As acknowledged earlier, the failure of the road of this case is ①.

arrow