logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.06.04 2013고정62
상해
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On October 16, 2012, the victim C (year 57) received a claim from the Defendant, who is an employee of the service company cleaning the underground parking lot of the above apartment at the factory site following the Gunsan-si apartment complex at around 08:50, stating that “it is difficult to clean due to the moving of the vehicles parked in the underground parking lot.”

The victim, who is the head of the above apartment management office, expressed the defendant's face about 10 times in drinking while taking the defendant's bath as "this sash down". The victim, who is the head of the above apartment management office, brought the defendant a brain-dead bath, sacrine, sacrine, sacrine, sacrine, sacrine, and sa

The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as above, her face was taken by the victim while taking a bath to himself/herself, and then her face was shakened and her face was taken over on 3-4 occasions, and her face was taken over on about 14 days, and the Defendant her spathum, spawds, and spawds caused the victim to be treated for about 14 days.

2. We examine the judgment, and there are statements in the victim C investigative agency and this court as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this case.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the records of the instant case, namely, ① the “E” which entered into a cleaning service contract with the said D apartment, entrusted the said D apartment site cleaning to the “F,” and the Defendant, an employee of the F, was in charge of the cleaning of the parking lot; ② G, an employee of E, calls in advance to the above apartment management office and calls to the relevant accounting officer to request that the “A parking control e-mail is carried out as it is planned to clean the parking lot on October 16, 2012,” and ③ that the Defendant was entrusted with the cleaning service company due to the failure to control the vehicle of the parking lot, and the Defendant, who was merely a mere being entrusted with the cleaning service company, is in the empty office of the management office, and the employees of the management office, after that time, inflict injury on the victim.

arrow