logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.27 2017가단71889
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff

A. For Defendant A Limited Partnership Company, KRW 108,000,758 and KRW 7,307,411 among them:

B. Defendant C, Defendant, etc.

Reasons

1. Each claim against Defendant A limited partnership company, C, and D:

(a) Description of claims: To describe the cause of claims and the changed cause of claims as shown in the annex;

(b) Claim against Defendant A Limited Partnership Company: Judgment on deemed confession (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

C. Claim against Defendant C or D: Judgment by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments by evidence Nos. 1 through 6 against the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties, the deceased I (hereinafter “the deceased”) was obligated to repay the Plaintiff’s indemnity liability as stated in the separate sheet and the changed cause of the claim. As the deceased died on March 18, 2015, Defendant C, D, the appointed parties, E, the appointed parties, the F, G, and H may jointly inherit the deceased’s obligations (the shares of 1/6), and the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties, F, G, and H received adjudication on repair of the deceased’s claims on September 28, 2016, without any dispute between the parties concerned, and the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the Plaintiff money within the scope of inherited property, such as the order of inheritance.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and all of them are accepted.

arrow