logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.16 2018가단5135891
양수금
Text

1. Within the extent of the property inherited from Nonparty E to the Plaintiff

(a) Appointors F shall be 34,212,846 won and those;

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the change in the specification of the claim;

2. In full view of each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, it can be acknowledged that the defendant (appointed party) and the appointed party F, G, and H received an adjudication on the repair of the inherited family court ruling under the Daejeon Family Court Support No. 2018-Ma728 on February 19, 2019, and there is no counter-proof otherwise.

Therefore, to the extent of the property inherited from the non-party E

(a) For 34,212,846 won and 16,66,67 won among them:

B. Defendant (Appointed Party), Defendant Appointed G, and H are obligated to pay 22,808,565 won each of them and 11,11,111 won each of them, with 22% interest per annum from May 23, 2007 to the date of full payment.

3. The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant (Appointed Party) D, Appointed G, and H is with merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow