1. The Defendant’s KRW 685,619,560 as well as 5% per annum from June 12, 2007 to October 30, 2012 to the Plaintiff.

At around 14:25 on June 12, 2007, Nonparty B operated a gallon Co., Ltd. car 2, which is owned by the same non-party Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and moved to the right side of the road in front of the 225 Hannam-dong, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, bypassing the right side of the road from the Hannam-dong, the accident point is likely to reduce the speed of the crosswalk, and if a pedestrian passes the crosswalk, he neglected his duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk and protect the pedestrian, while neglecting his duty of care to protect the pedestrian from the right side of the said vehicle due to negligence when he violated the above duty of care. The part of the plaintiff's bridge, which was a road to the right side of the said passenger vehicle, was turned to the front side of the above vehicle volume, and further proceeded with the plaintiff's left side side of the said vehicle with the front side of the said vehicle volume.

(hereinafter referred to as the "traffic accident of this case". The plaintiff suffered injury, such as the upper right fladal ladal ladal ladal ladal ladal ladal ladal ladal ladal ladal ladal ladal, the left right ladal ladal ladal ladal, the left ladal ladal ladal ladal ladal ladal, the left ladal ladal ladal ladal la, the right ladal ladals

The defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the owner on the above vehicle quantity.

[Grounds for recognition] According to the facts without dispute, Gap 1 and 2's written statements, Gap 7 and Eul 3 (including provisional numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply)'s written statements, shapes, images, and the whole purport of the pleading, the non-party B bears the liability for damages under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the defendant who is the insurer who has taken over the above liability for damages of the non-party B is liable to the plaintiff for all property and mental damages caused by the traffic accident of this case.

Before limitation of liability, this paper examined the limitation of liability.