beta
Text
1.The judgment of the first instance, including a claim extended and reduced in the trial, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Basic facts 1) B is the owner of the vehicle C and the defendant is the insurer who has concluded the comprehensive automobile insurance contract with B with respect to the vehicle. 2) B around 18:00 on December 4, 2006, around 18:00, while driving the vehicle at six-lanes in front of the width golf course located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the vehicle is driving along the vehicle at six-lanes and driving toward the inside the direction of the Gu road. Since the vehicle signal is installed on the front side of the road and the pedestrian signal is installed, the vehicle is installed in the road. In such a case, the driver is negligent in neglecting the duty of care to protect pedestrians driving along the vehicle and driving along the crosswalk according to the pedestrian signal while neglecting the duty of care to protect them, and led the plaintiff's right edge, etc., which was cut along the above pedestrian signal to the front edge of the vehicle.
(3) On December 11, 2006, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductals and metal pins at D Hospital at the instant traffic accident. On April 14, 2007, the Plaintiff was discharged from the hospital on the following grounds: (a) on December 11, 2006, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductalms, arctal ductal, and physical therapy; and (b) on April 14, 207, the Plaintiff
B. According to the above facts, B is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the tort, and the Defendant is liable to pay the insurance money directly to the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 724(2) of the Commercial Act.
2. Scope of liability for damages
A. The Plaintiff’s age remains 47 years and 2 months at the time of the instant traffic accident. The Plaintiff’s age remains 180,000 won per month, when working as a cook at the time of the instant traffic accident. 2) Employment and income is the Plaintiff as a cook at the time of the instant traffic accident.