Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:10 to 15:20 on October 1, 2018, the Defendant stolen the Defendant’s display of the Victim’s 2nd floor C store in the store by using the gaps in which the management of the Victim was neglected, which caused the theft by 368,00 won of the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of witness D;

1. E statements;

1. Results of reproduction of criminal CCTV data CDs;

1. CCTV 영상 재확인에 대한 수사 피고인 및 변호인은, 피고인은 당시 피해 매장에 함께 갔던 피고인의 모친이 피고인에게 ‘이 사건 선글라스를 써보고 싶으니 가져다 달라’고 말하여 피고인이 모친에게 이 사건 선글라스를 가져다주었는데 모친이 깜빡하고 이 사건 선글라스를 쇼핑백에 넣는 바람에 이를 가지고 나오게 된 것일 뿐, 절취의 고의로 이 사건 선글라스를 가져간 것이 아니라고 주장한다.

The following circumstances, which can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, and ① if the Defendant collected the instant glass from CCTV images installed in the damaged store, and then changed the location of the display of the instant glass in the same display stand, the Defendant entered the glass glass as if the glass glass glass were sealed.

On the face of the discharge, it is clearly confirmed that the head of the Gu, etc., where the head of the Gu, who had moved to a mother's wife after the passage, did not flick the mother's wife, and the head of the Gu, who has used the flick continuously, was using the flick. The Defendant's act confirmed through the above CCTV video does not fit the Defendant's defense at all, and ② the Defendant's defense against the reasons why the instant glick was not contacted after the discovery of the instant glick at the house or the Defendant's defense against the reasons why the glick was not returned