The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) did not constitute a product that the victim’s employee E purchased in another store with clothes 1 set of the facts charged (hereinafter “the clothes of this case”).

The Defendant expressed to E the intent to purchase the clothes of this case in addition, and so, he knew that E calculated the price including the clothes of this case.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, the defendant could fully recognize the fact that the defendant deceivings E as stated in the facts charged and acquired the clothes of this case.

1) According to the results of a CD (D submitted CCTV image file), ① the Defendant’s use of the inner clothes of this case, which he had been displayed in the front of the calculation unit, and then came back to the front of the calculation unit, ② the Defendant’s use of other white flaz’s clothes from F, and then was in the calculation unit.

It shall be transferred to E, and it shall be delivered to E, <3, 3, the part of the part of the part of the part of the defendant's packing package that he received, and then, the part of the part of the part of the defendant's packing package that the defendant would pay by using the calculating machine after finding the same goods of the business desired by E; 4, the part of the part of the case where the defendant used the part of the defendant's body in front of the calculation of his fingers to E, and made a speech to E, and immediately transferred the credit card, and immediately transferred the part of the part of the case to E, and 5, this part of the part of the defendant's " not so important."

As "", the defective defendant's face-to-face talks with words, 6. The defendant's face-to-face of a green shopping bag after the calculation of E is completed, and the defendant was in the shopping bag he brought.