logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.08 2012고정6674
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. A. Around May 27, 2011, the Defendant heard from C the horses that “Woolopon (psychotropic drugs, psychotropic drugs, and philoopon (hereinafter referred to as “copon”) was hopon and consented thereto.”

After receiving KRW 2.5 million from C, the Defendant moved from C to Daegu via the KTX on the same day, purchased approximately KRW 3.5g of 16:30 on the 16:30th day of the same day the Defendant purchased approximately KRW 3.5g of philopon from D on the front side of the E, and delivered the said philopon to Seoul and to C.

B. On July 6, 2011, the Defendant received KRW 500,000 from C with a request to the same effect.

After moving from KTX to Daejeon on the same day, the Defendant purchased approximately 0.7g (one disposable injection equipment) from D in the vicinity of F on the same day in the amount of KRW 500,000,000, and returned to Seoul and delivered the said phiphone to C.

Accordingly, even though the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, the Defendant transported philophones over two occasions as above.

2. Around June 6, 2011, Defendant B heard the horses that “I am off to Daejeon, I am off from D, and am off from D,” and consented thereto, Defendant B transferred KRW 1,500,000 from C to Daejeon.

At around 19:00 on the same day, the Defendant purchased approximately 2.1g (three disposable injection equipment) from D to 1.5 million won, and delivered the said phiphone to Seoul and C.

Accordingly, even though the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, the Defendant transported philophones as above.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. The defendant A's partial statement in the first trial record;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the defendant A (18 pages of investigation record);

1. Examination protocol of suspect D by the prosecution (Defendant B);

1. Some statements in the police interrogation protocol of Defendant B (10 pages of investigation record);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the suspect examination protocol of D to prosecution;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow