logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.03 2013고단8437
사기등
Text

Defendant

A is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and by imprisonment with prison labor for 2013 order 8437.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Incheon District Court on June 10, 2010, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 18, 2010. Defendant D was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Military Service Act at the Seoul Western District Court on January 9, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 22, 2013. On February 6, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the Seoul Western District Court on June 2, 2014.

"2013 Highest 8437"

1. On April 19, 2012, Defendant A, B, and C’s joint criminal conduct of embezzlement committed by the victim J with the promise that “A would pay KRW 1,300,000 per month in return for the loan of the vehicle,” and the victim’s vehicle (an amount equivalent to K, Humanate, 27,000,000) was handed over by the victim’sJ, and the victim’s vehicle was disposed of as the so-called “alternative car” without changing the name.

Defendant

B, around June 2012, after removing the location tracking devices (GPS) installed on the said vehicle, the said J made it impossible for the said J to grasp the location of the vehicle, and then made it false to see that the said J was stolen after leasing the said vehicle to the J, which was introduced as a person who confirmed the victim J or found the Defendant A in a specialized manner before the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office around June 26, 2012.

Defendant

A needs to find a motor vehicle to the above J at the above location, and by taking advantage of the fact that the J’s certificate of personal seal impression 6, the certificate of vehicle registration, the certificate of seal imprint and the above J did not have knowledge about the motor vehicle transaction, A had the J affix his/her signature and seal on various motor vehicle transaction-related documents, such as a vehicle transfer certificate, a vehicle sales contract certificate, a vehicle storage certificate, a vehicle certificate and a certificate of vehicle operation confirmation, a vehicle transfer and towing letter, a vehicle transfer and towing letter, and the vehicle transfer certificate, and the above documents were delivered to the Defendant B at a place without the above J.

Defendant

B around June 26, 2012, Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yongsan-gu.

arrow