logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.11.12 2015고단2492
전기통신금융사기피해방지및피해금환급에관한특별법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant and C (In the course of investigation) and D (Detention) are the so-called cash withdrawal measures of international telecommunications financial fraud (hereinafter referred to as “scam”), and the organization is composed of an organization that operates a call center at a remote area of China (hereinafter referred to as “Scam”) to induce transfer of passbooks and deposits by telephone, and an organization that takes charge of transfer of passbooks, withdrawal of damages, and transfer of money. Under the instruction of the person who is the general book box in China, the conciliation staff in the name of the Chinese government call center from among the Korean call center to unspecified persons in the Republic of Korea through Kckset Service, etc., let the Defendant and the above C and D, a cash withdrawal book in the Republic of Korea, receive loans, etc. from the general book box in order to transfer money from the above domestic call center to victims, and the Defendant and the above C and D deposited the money with the above order of the person who is the above organization’s name in China.

1. On June 25, 2015, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, via Kwikset service articles near the new forest subway station located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant received one copy of the C, D and the C, and one check card, which is a means of access connected to the E bank account (F) from E.

Accordingly, the Defendant acquired an electronic form card in collusion with C and D in order to make a transaction request in electronic financial transactions or to secure the authenticity and accuracy of users and transaction details.

2. Violation of the Special Act on Fraudulent and Telecommunications-based Financial Fraud and Refund of Loss;

A. On June 26, 2015, when committing the crime against the victim G, the employee in charge of the domestic scaming of the name in the name of the victim G does not have the intent or ability to provide the loan.

arrow