A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant and his accomplice are the so-called cash withdrawal scheme of international telecommunications fraud (hereinafter referred to as “scam”), which consists of an organization that operates a call center at a remote area of China or lower, operates a call center in order to induce transfer of passbooks and deposits by telephone, and an organization that takes over passbooks, withdraws from deposits, and transfers money. Under the direction of the person who was not registered in the Republic of Korea, the employee under whose name is not registered, made the Defendant and his accomplice transfer a certain amount of money to the victims under the name of the person who was not registered in Korea, using the means of access such as the check card, etc., using the Kwikline service, etc., by visiting loans from the domestic call center to unspecified persons in Korea. In addition, the employee under whose name is not registered, made the Defendant and his accomplice to transfer the money to the victims under the pretext of allowing them to receive loans from the call center in China under the direction of the person who was not registered in the name of the person who was registered in China. The Defendant and the above D deposited the money from Korea to China in order.

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act may transfer or acquire a means of access, or may borrow or borrow a means of access while demanding or promising to receive compensation therefor;

Nevertheless, on April 3, 2015, the Defendant conspired with his accomplice D and received 20 copies of the physical card in collusion with Kwikset service article in front of Suwon-si, from F on the account of a national bank account in its name (Account Number G) and an enterprise bank account (Account Number H) from F, including one copy of the physical card, and nine copies of the physical card in front of Suwon-si, and received a total of 20 copies of the physical card from around that time to April 10, 2015, as shown in attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with the above D.